PDA

View Full Version : Astrology back in the day!



Kevin Mowad
16th June 2010, 07:35 PM
Hi I was just looking for a bit of clarity on the subject of Astrology. Now, I understand that reading the stars in order to tell someones future is completely wrong. However, what about when people used it as a means of travel and other useful things. This is the same with other forms of science. Is it wrong to appreciate these various wonders that have been revealed to us through various scientific studies?

DavidObeid
16th June 2010, 09:27 PM
Hi Kevin,

It's important not to confuse astronomy with astrology, and then not to confuse the rhythm of the heavenly bodies and astrological constellations with some superstitions attached to them (such as fortune telling).

Astrological calendars are fine, saying that because I am Leo I will have such and such an encounter today is dangerous.

Does that help?

Kevin Mowad
17th June 2010, 12:18 AM
Thankyou for that answer. However, various people I know are very anti-Science and technology, and would not accept that reading the stars for anything is good. How should I approach them?

DavidObeid
17th June 2010, 08:53 AM
I wouldn't discuss the matter with them.

Treat this like one of the "anythings" in Romans 14:

Romans 14:20-21
20 Do not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God. Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for any one to make others fall by what he eats;21 it is right not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that makes your brother stumble.

Kevin Mowad
18th June 2010, 02:29 AM
Ok. So I understand what your saying. However, this person is deeply rooted in their catholic faith and just refuses to accept that any form of scientific knowledge can be of God. Even though so much good has been done because of that knowledge that we have gained. See, the way I see it, and correct me if I'm wrong here, is that God allows us to gain this knowledge so that we may use it to help others, thus helping our souls to grow more and more closer to God because of these good works. We can't look at everything that has come along as a result of more knowledge and increasingly advanced technology as being of the devil. I am also deeply rooted in my Catholic faith, but I refuse to think so negatively. But that's what is frustrating me so much is that this negative approach is taken not only by this person but by others aswell. That's why I asked my original question. I just don't think I worded it correctly which I apologise for. I hope I make more sense now! God Bless!

New Jack Swinger
18th June 2010, 02:40 AM
So in other words, the person is anti-science, anti-technology or development etc? We would have been better without developments of science etc?

DavidObeid
18th June 2010, 06:12 AM
Hi Kevin,

No need to apologise.

Point out to your friend that Scripture is clear, and we re-affirm each time we pray the Nicene Creed in Mass, that God made all things.

If God made the universe and the laws that govern it then to learn more about the universe with this in mind is really an act of homage to God.

The Holy Father spoke about St. Thomas Aquinas the other day and touched on this issue. Here is what the Vatican Information Service's news report had to say with my emphases in bold:


THOMAS AQUINAS: INTER-RELATION OF PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY

VATICAN CITY, 16 JUN 2010 (VIS) - In his catechesis during this morning's general audience, Benedict XVI continued his presentation of the figure of St. Thomas Aquinas, "a theologian of such importance that the study of his works was explicitly recommended by Vatican Council II", he said. He also recalled how in 1880 Leo XIII declared him as patron of Catholic schools and universities.

The Pope noted how Thomas Aquinas focused on the distinction between philosophy and theology. This was because in his time, in the light of Aristotelian and Platonic thought on the one hand, and the philosophy of the Church Fathers on the other, "the burning question was whether ... a philosophy elaborated without reference to Christ and the world of faith, and that elaborated bearing Christ and the world of faith in mind, were compatible or mutually exclusive".

"Thomas", the Holy Father explained, "was firmly convinced that they were compatible, and that the philosophy elaborated without Christ was awaiting only the light of Jesus in order to be made complete. The novelty of Thomas, what determined his path as a thinker, was this: to demonstrate the independence of philosophy and theology, and at the same time their inter-relation".

For the "Doctor Angelicus", the Pope went on, "faith consolidates, integrates and illuminates the heritage of truth acquired by human reason. The trust St. Thomas places in these two instruments of knowledge (faith and reason) can be explained by his conviction that both come from a single wellspring of truth, the divine Logos which works in the area of both creation and redemption".

Having established the principle of reason and faith, St. Thomas makes it clear that they follow different cognitive processes: "Reason accepts a truth by virtue of its intrinsic evidence, either mediated or direct; faith, on the other hand, accepts a truth on the basis of the authority of the revealed Word of God".

"This distinction ensures the autonomy of the human sciences, ... and the theological sciences. However this does not mean a separation; rather, it implies mutual and advantageous collaboration. Faith, in fact, protects reason from any temptation to mistrust in its own capacities and stimulates it to open itself to ever broader horizons".

"Reason too, with the means at its disposal, can do something important for faith, offering it a triple service which St. Thomas summarises thus: ... 'demonstrating the foundations of faith; using similitudes to explain the truth of faith; rebuffing the objections that arise against the faith'. The entire history of Christian theology is, in the final analysis, the exercise of this duty of the intellect, which shows the intelligibility of the faith, its inner structure and harmony, its reasonableness and its capacity to promote the good of man.

"The correctness of theological reasoning and its true cognitive significance is based on the value of theological language which, according to St. Thomas, is principally a language of analogy", the Pope added. "Analogy recognises shared perfections in the created world and in God". Thomas based his doctrine of analogy, "not only on purely philosophical arguments, but also on the fact that, with the revelation, God Himself spoke to us and, thus, authorised us to speak about Him".

The Holy Father highlighted the importance of this doctrine which, he said, "helps us overcome certain objections raised by modern atheism which denies that religious language possesses objective meaning and holds that it only has a subjective or merely emotional value. In the light of the teachings of St. Thomas, theology affirms that, however limited, religious language does have meaning".

St. Thomas' moral theology retains great relevance in its affirmation that "the theological and moral virtues of man are rooted in human nature", said Pope Benedict. "Divine Grace accompanies, supports and encourages ethical commitment but, according to St. Thomas, all men and women, believers and non-believers, are of themselves called to recognise the requirements of human nature as expressed in natural law, and to draw inspiration therefrom when formulating positive law; that is, the laws produced by civil and political authorities to regulate human society.

"When natural law and the responsibility it implies are denied," he added, "the way is thrown dramatically open to ethical relativism at an individual level, and to totalitarianism at a political level. Defending the universal rights of man and affirming the absolute value of the dignity of the person presupposes a foundation: and is not this foundation natural law, with the non-negotiable values it contains?".

"Thomas", the Holy Father concluded, "presents us with a broad and trusting view of human reason. Broad, because it is not limited to the area of empirical-scientific reason but open to all of existence and therefore also to the fundamental and inescapable questions of human life; trusting, because human reason, especially if it welcomes the inspiration of Christian faith, promotes a civilisation which recognises the dignity of the person, the inviolability of his rights and the cogency of his duties".
AG/ VIS 20100616 (830)

Kevin Mowad
18th June 2010, 06:46 PM
Mate that is an awesome response thanks heaps!!